UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Office of Administrative Law Judges

  • Menu
  • About OALJ
    • Overview
    • About the Chief Judge
    • FAQs
    • Organizational Chart
  • Contacts
    • Contacting OALJ
    • National Office
    • BALCA
    • District Offices:
      • Boston, MA
      • Cherry Hill, NJ
      • Cincinnati, OH
      • Covington, LA
      • Newport News, VA
      • Pittsburgh, PA
      • San Francisco, CA
      • Washington, DC
  • Keyword / Case Number Searches
  • DMS Search
  • Case Status
DOL Home > OALJ > Whistleblower > Morrison v. Clearone Communications, Inc., 2004-SOX-25 (ALJ May 25, 2004)
USDOL/OALJ Reporter

Morrison v. Clearone Communications, Inc., 2004-SOX-25 (ALJ May 25, 2004)


U.S. Department of LaborOffice of Administrative Law Judges
50 Fremont Street, Suite 2100
San Francisco, CA 94105

(415) 744-6577
(415) 744-6569 (FAX)

DOL Seal

Issue Date: 25 May 2004

CASE NO. 2004-SOX-0025

In the Matter of:

TIMOTHY MORRISON,
    Complainant,

vs.

CLEARONE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.,
    Respondent.

FINAL ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT

    On February 11, 2003, Complainant Timothy J. Morrison filed a complaint against ClearOne Communications, Inc., in which he alleged a violation of § 806 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ("SOX" or "the Act"). 18 U.S.C. 1514A. On February 9, 2004, the Regional Administrator of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration issued a Preliminary Order in Mr. Morrison's favor. On March 5, 2004, ClearOne objected to the Preliminary Order. On March 19, 2004, ClearOne moved to rescind its objection on the grounds that it had reached a settlement with Mr. Morrison, but the settlement agreement was not included with its request. On May 13, 2004, the parties submitted the settlement for approval, with a request that the terms of the agreement be treated as confidential commercial information pursuant to Exemption Four of the Freedom of Information Act ("FOIA"). 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(4).

    Having reviewed the parties' agreement with regard to the complaint under SOX, I find that it appears to be fair and reasonable on its face and to effectuate the purposes and policies of the Act. The instant Order shall have the same force and effect as one made after a full hearing on the merits.

    Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Agreement is APPROVED and ClearOne's objection to the Preliminary Order is DISMISSED.

       ALEXANDER KARST
       Administrative Law Judge

AK:jb

UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

United States Department of Labor
Office of Administrative Law Judges
800 K St NW
Washington, DC 20001
(202) 693-7300
www.oalj.dol.gov

FEDERAL GOVERNMENT

  • White House
  • USA.gov
  • NO FEAR Act Data
  • U.S. Office of Special Counsel

LABOR DEPARTMENT

  • Español
  • Office of Inspector General
  • Subscribe to the DOL Newsletter
  • Read the DOL Newsletter
  • Emergency Accountability Status Link
  • A to Z Index

ABOUT THE SITE

  • Freedom of Information Act
  • Privacy and Security Statement
  • Disclaimers
  • Important Website Notices
  • Plug-Ins Used on DOL.gov
  • Accessibility Statement